Violent Video Games

Researchers, p arnts and educators atomic number 18 altogether discussing the dissension around reddened motion picture games and their influence on kids. The audience come outs to be divided into two large groups unmatched is in favor of narrowing or crimson banning knock-down-and-drag-out delineation games as they establish children (and, arguably, adults as well) much prone to aggressive appearance, bid that seen on the screen. Opponents of this adopt claim that picture games do non run gaga behavior in real life and atomic number 18, in fact, a safe acquittance to natural aggression and foiling.Representatives of the first group such(prenominal) as john king of beasts, in his article When Life Imitates Video ask that honoring myriad deaths and identifying with killers would undoubtedly lead to passel feeling more comfortable just some violence and suffering in their ein truthday life. He even goes so far as to say that performing games that quest s hooting people is akin to undergoing training to kill (in former(a) words, it is comparable a coiffe rehearsal of potential murders). (Leo 1999).On the other hand, at that place ar claims that violent media atomic number 18 beneficial Cones), because in the present world kids atomic number 18 at a higher risk of growing up supine and weak than violent and riotous, and when hey see examples of rebellion, domination and well, violence, they are able to maneuver their suppressed feelings and occupy with issues that otherwise remain un settle. In my opinion, violent word-painting games can non be at once responsible for real-life violence but on the impertinent they can patron release stress and anger in non-violent methods. keister Leo agrees that most murders are not directly connected to violent games. However, he says that some murders are. In particular, Dylan Klebold and Eric Harris, the students who murdered 13 and wounded 21 more people in Columbine high take aim massacre, enjoyed compete characterisation games such as Doom, and they acted out in real life what they turn over seen on the screen. Well, even in this particular case, it is not that simple. Obviously, a stripe more than playing murderous games moderated to the actual killings in carbon monoxide.The teenager murderers were often the victims of bullying (involving creation covered in ketchup in school cafeteria and having fecal consequence thrown at them). Once they were arrested based on wrongful accusations, and that was very traumatic for both of them. The mother of Dylan Klebold admitted that she prayed that her son would ommit self-annihilation this illustrates lack of curb for the boy in the family. The other youth, Eric Harris, was taking an antidepressant, which he abruptly discontinued, and that is some other(prenominal) possible reason for emotional instability and idealistic aggression levels.All of the supra does not indicate that Dylan Klebold and Eric H arris were completely innocent. They were not. Yet, at that place villainys were not caused directly by video games, as most likely their playing violent games were not a cause but an outcome of frustration which they had because of different factors. If there are essons to be learned from this massacre, it is necessary to hit that to prevent another incident like that from happening, it would be insufficient to effective ban violent video games.A lot of issues involving peer and teacher support, psychic health, prevention of bullying, education, walking(prenominal) attention to what is going on in kids lives get to be resolved to promote safety and make sure this fiber of episode is neer repeated. Also, video games have been around for several decades, magic spell Going pole to the Colorado massacre, Dylan and Eric thought very highly of Adolf Hitler. Their irresistible impulse with anti-human philosophies has no joining to violent video games, but obviously it displays that the kids were not properly socialized.The games were not the scarcely outlet of feelings of aggression, rejection and frustration that the boys carried around. And, speaking of Adolf Hitler he obviously never vie violent video games, simply because they were not around defend then. That did not make him a nice person, wee-wee to resolve conflicts peacefully. And he is not alone, human history abounds in ruthless, cruel, realise to inflict torture and degrade other people. And, historically, these dictators have not played violent ready reckoner games either.Gerard Jones is more persuasive because he is talking about his personal pay back and that of his son, and some other real kids. Unlike John Leo, who did not seem to do the background check on the Colorado massacre (or else, cut the findings and picked out only the facts that support his theory), Gerard Jones evidence looks more persuasive, as he indicates that violent video games (and comics, and other media produ cts, for that matter) not only channel aggression, they dish up to manage such emotions as fear, greed, rage and causation hunger.In modern society, those emotions are considered inappropriate. Children, however, have to deal with them and imaginary selves, capable of discourse and using those motivations, are very helpful in this aspect. Statistics show that crime does not go up in the countries where people play a lot of video games. The crime rate depends on other things prosperity, economics, psychological wellbeing, and so on, violent media content does not seem to be one of them. However, maybe virtual(prenominal) violence make people less sensible and more absorb with themselves, less emphatic to others?These matters are really firmly to measure however, in my opinion, our society is placing emphasis on equal opportunities, white play, human rights and charity. Therefore, it is wild to say that people now are callous, deadened and heartless. That is simply not true. The studies that show that there is a link betwixt violence on screen and violence in reality, say that there is a connection but not necessarily cause-and-effect dependency. In other words, people who move to be violent would choose violent games, musical composition the reverse tale does not hold true.It is true that the video games, movies, comics and stories all bear influence upon the society at large and each individual(a) member of it. Indeed, watching indiscriminate violent content all the sentence does not contribute to a child growing up into a reasonable, intelligent or, for that matter, good adult. However, there is no sufficient reason to raise that there is a direct connection between violent video games and real-life violence they or else demonstrate are verse effect of solace down disallow feelings. Works Cited Jones, Gerard. Violent Media is Good for Kids. June 27, 2000. Web. 24 Feb. 2013Violent Video GamesResearchers, parents and educators are all discu ssing the controversy around violent video games and their influence on kids. The audience seems to be divided into two large groups one is in favor of restricting or even banning violent video games as they make children (and, arguably, adults as well) more prone to aggressive behavior, like that seen on the screen. Opponents of this view claim that video games do not cause violent behavior in real life and are, in fact, a safe outlet to natural aggression and frustration.Representatives of the first group such as John Leo, in his article When Life Imitates Video argue that watching countless deaths and identifying with killers would undoubtedly lead to people feeling more comfortable about violence and suffering in their everyday life. He even goes so far as to say that playing games that involve shooting people is akin to undergoing training to kill (in other words, it is like a dress rehearsal of potential murders). (Leo 1999).On the other hand, there are claims that violent med ia are beneficial Cones), because in the present world kids are at a higher risk of growing up passive and weak than violent and riotous, and when hey see examples of rebellion, domination and well, violence, they are able to channel their suppressed feelings and deal with issues that otherwise remain unresolved. In my opinion, violent video games cannot be directly responsible for real-life violence but on the contrary they can help release stress and anger in non-violent methods.John Leo agrees that most murders are not directly connected to violent games. However, he says that some murders are. In particular, Dylan Klebold and Eric Harris, the students who murdered 13 and wounded 21 more people in Columbine high school massacre, enjoyed playing video games such as Doom, and they acted out in real life what they have seen on the screen. Well, even in this particular case, it is not that simple. Obviously, a lot more than playing murderous games contributed to the actual killings i n Colorado.The teenager murderers were frequently the victims of bullying (involving being covered in ketchup in school cafeteria and having fecal matter thrown at them). Once they were arrested based on wrongful accusations, and that was very traumatic for both of them. The mother of Dylan Klebold admitted that she prayed that her son would ommit suicide this illustrates lack of support for the boy in the family. The other youth, Eric Harris, was taking an antidepressant, which he abruptly discontinued, and that is another possible reason for emotional instability and elevated aggression levels.All of the above does not indicate that Dylan Klebold and Eric Harris were completely innocent. They were not. Yet, there crimes were not caused directly by video games, as most likely their playing violent games were not a cause but an outcome of frustration which they had because of different factors. If there are essons to be learned from this massacre, it is necessary to realize that to prevent another incident like that from happening, it would be insufficient to Just ban violent video games.A lot of issues involving peer and teacher support, mental health, prevention of bullying, education, closer attention to what is going on in kids lives need to be resolved to promote safety and make sure this type of episode is never repeated. Also, video games have been around for several decades, while Going back to the Colorado massacre, Dylan and Eric thought very highly of Adolf Hitler. Their obsession with anti-human philosophies has no connection to violent video games, but obviously it displays that the kids were not properly socialized.The games were not the only outlet of feelings of aggression, rejection and frustration that the boys carried around. And, speaking of Adolf Hitler he obviously never played violent video games, simply because they were not around back then. That did not make him a nice person, ready to resolve conflicts peacefully. And he is not alon e, human history abounds in ruthless, cruel, ready to inflict pain and degrade other people. And, historically, these dictators have not played violent computer games either.Gerard Jones is more persuasive because he is talking about his personal experience and that of his son, and some other real kids. Unlike John Leo, who did not seem to do the background check on the Colorado massacre (or else, ignored the findings and picked out only the facts that support his theory), Gerard Jones evidence looks more persuasive, as he indicates that violent video games (and comics, and other media products, for that matter) not only channel aggression, they help to manage such emotions as fear, greed, rage and power hunger.In modern society, those emotions are considered inappropriate. Children, however, have to deal with them and imaginary selves, capable of handling and using those motivations, are very helpful in this aspect. Statistics show that crime does not go up in the countries where people play a lot of video games. The crime rate depends on other things prosperity, economics, psychological wellbeing, and so on, violent media content does not seem to be one of them. However, maybe virtual violence make people less sensitive and more engrossed with themselves, less emphatic to others?These matters are really hard to measure however, in my opinion, our society is placing emphasis on equal opportunities, fair play, human rights and charity. Therefore, it is incorrect to say that people now are callous, insensitive and heartless. That is simply not true. The studies that show that there is a link between violence on screen and violence in reality, say that there is a connection but not necessarily cause-and-effect dependency. In other words, people who tend to be violent would choose violent games, while the reverse statement does not hold true.It is true that the video games, movies, comics and stories all bear influence upon the society at large and each individu al member of it. Indeed, watching indiscriminate violent content all the time does not contribute to a child growing up into a reasonable, intelligent or, for that matter, healthy adult. However, there is no sufficient reason to state that there is a direct connection between violent video games and real-life violence they rather demonstrate are verse effect of calming down negative feelings. Works Cited Jones, Gerard. Violent Media is Good for Kids. June 27, 2000. Web. 24 Feb. 2013